Interactive Demo
Interactive Demo
This case study explores a Jira Software Product Tour experiment aimed at increasing user signups through an interactive board and issue demo. By combining product demo with marketing, the project provided a hands-on experience to showcase Jira’s value and boost user confidence in its features.
Impact
Impact
Goal: A 5% uplift in signup rates within 7 days.
Outcome: After 14 days, metrics remained flat. Though we fell short of the target, the project delivered key insights for future experiments.
Goal: A 5% uplift in signup rates within 7 days.
Outcome: After 14 days, metrics remained flat. Though we fell short of the target, the project delivered key insights for future experiments.
Impact
Goal: A 5% uplift in signup rates within 7 days.
Outcome: After 14 days, metrics remained flat. Though we fell short of the target, the project delivered key insights for future experiments.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
0%Account
Creation0%Viewed Email
OTP Screen-0%Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Treatment A
Account
Creation
Viewed Email
OTP Screen
Signups
Changes:
Moved the product shot to the right and the redesigned signup form to the left.
Increased the size and prominence of the product shot.
Outcome: Despite positive interaction metrics, the overall signup rate decreased significantly compared to the control.
Treatment B
Account
Creation
Viewed Email
OTP Screen
Signups
Changes:
Same setup as Treatment A with two additional elements:
An animated product shot to enhance engagement.
Social proof below the signup form.
Outcome: Smaller signup rate decrease (not statistically significant) compared to the control.
Context
Context
Building on a previous win—where an interactive timeline demo boosted signups by 10%—the team hypothesized that highlighting Jira’s board and issue features could drive similar gains.
Goal: Increase signup rates by 5% by integrating an interactive demo into the Jira Software Product Tour, offering new users a clear demonstration of Jira’s core value and fostering their confidence in its capabilities.
Control
Control
Building on a previous win—where an interactive timeline demo boosted signups by 10%—the team hypothesized that highlighting Jira’s board and issue features could drive similar gains.
Goal: Increase signup rates by 5% by integrating an interactive demo into the Jira Software Product Tour, offering new users a clear demonstration of Jira’s core value and fostering their confidence in its capabilities.
Control
Context
Building on a previous win—where an interactive timeline demo boosted signups by 10%—the team hypothesized that highlighting Jira’s board and issue features could drive similar gains.
Goal: Increase signup rates by 5% by integrating an interactive demo into the Jira Software Product Tour, offering new users a clear demonstration of Jira’s core value and fostering their confidence in its capabilities.
Control
What we learned
What we learned
The post-experiment analysis uncovered audience mismatches and visibility gaps, prompting critical questions for future iterations—namely, how to narrow the target audience and ensure better exposure.
The post-experiment analysis uncovered audience mismatches and visibility gaps, prompting critical questions for future iterations—namely, how to narrow the target audience and ensure better exposure.
What we learned
The post-experiment analysis uncovered audience mismatches and visibility gaps, prompting critical questions for future iterations—namely, how to narrow the target audience and ensure better exposure.
Process
Process
This overview spans initial research through final execution and illustrates how I crafted an engaging interactive demo. The process prioritized user needs and delivered tangible results by leveraging data-driven insights and collaborative workshops.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.
Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
This overview spans initial research through final execution and illustrates how I crafted an engaging interactive demo. The process prioritized user needs and delivered tangible results by leveraging data-driven insights and collaborative workshops.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Process
This overview spans initial research through final execution and illustrates how I crafted an engaging interactive demo. The process prioritized user needs and delivered tangible results by leveraging data-driven insights and collaborative workshops.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Attractiveness Analysis
To measure the success of the redesign, I used attractiveness analysis—assessing how visually appealing and engaging each element was for users. This helped determine whether the updated layout effectively captured and retained their interest.
Before the Redesign
The original hero section prioritized an embedded signup form, overshadowing the product shot. While functional, it didn’t draw users into the product visuals, reducing the overall appeal of the hero section.Engagement Rate Analysis
To gauge the redesign’s effectiveness, I analyzed engagement rates—tracking how users interacted with core elements on the page before and after the update. This metric revealed whether the new layout successfully captured user interest and encouraged deeper interaction.
Before the Redesign: While the original hero section’s embedded signup form had a high click rate, the product shot and other key information saw minimal engagement. This indicated that users were focused on signing up but missing valuable details about the product.
Final Design
The final interactive demo allowed users to explore Jira Software’s board and issue features in a hands-on, guided format, seamlessly merging product functionality with marketing for an authentic experience.
Challenges:
Despite strong engagement, the demo did not reach the 5% signup goal.
Key obstacles included targeting a broad audience and the demo’s low-visibility placement.
Final Design
The final interactive demo allowed users to explore Jira Software’s board and issue features in a hands-on, guided format, seamlessly merging product functionality with marketing for an authentic experience.
Challenges:
Despite strong engagement, the demo did not reach the 5% signup goal.
Key obstacles included targeting a broad audience and the demo’s low-visibility placement.
Final Design
The final interactive demo allowed users to explore Jira Software’s board and issue features in a hands-on, guided format, seamlessly merging product functionality with marketing for an authentic experience.
Challenges:
Despite strong engagement, the demo did not reach the 5% signup goal.
Key obstacles included targeting a broad audience and the demo’s low-visibility placement.
Final Design
The final interactive demo allowed users to explore Jira Software’s board and issue features in a hands-on, guided format, seamlessly merging product functionality with marketing for an authentic experience.
Challenges:
Despite strong engagement, the demo did not reach the 5% signup goal.
Key obstacles included targeting a broad audience and the demo’s low-visibility placement.
Reflection
Lessons Learned
Target Audience:
Challenge: The experiment targeted all users visiting the product tour, but 30% were already logged in and not in the target demographic.
Lesson: Narrow the target audience to new users (N2N) for future experiments.
Visibility:
Challenge: The demo was placed below the fold, with only 37% of users scrolling to view it.
Lesson: Ensure interactive elements are visible above the fold to maximize exposure.
Data Dilution:
Challenge: The exposure event fired at page load, including users who never interacted with the demo.
Lesson: Redefine exposure criteria to reflect actual interaction.
Reflection
Lessons Learned
Target Audience:
Challenge: The experiment targeted all users visiting the product tour, but 30% were already logged in and not in the target demographic.
Lesson: Narrow the target audience to new users (N2N) for future experiments.
Visibility:
Challenge: The demo was placed below the fold, with only 37% of users scrolling to view it.
Lesson: Ensure interactive elements are visible above the fold to maximize exposure.
Data Dilution:
Challenge: The exposure event fired at page load, including users who never interacted with the demo.
Lesson: Redefine exposure criteria to reflect actual interaction.
Reflection
Lessons Learned
Target Audience:
Challenge: The experiment targeted all users visiting the product tour, but 30% were already logged in and not in the target demographic.
Lesson: Narrow the target audience to new users (N2N) for future experiments.
Visibility:
Challenge: The demo was placed below the fold, with only 37% of users scrolling to view it.
Lesson: Ensure interactive elements are visible above the fold to maximize exposure.
Data Dilution:
Challenge: The exposure event fired at page load, including users who never interacted with the demo.
Lesson: Redefine exposure criteria to reflect actual interaction.
Reflection
Lessons Learned
Target Audience:
Challenge: The experiment targeted all users visiting the product tour, but 30% were already logged in and not in the target demographic.
Lesson: Narrow the target audience to new users (N2N) for future experiments.
Visibility:
Challenge: The demo was placed below the fold, with only 37% of users scrolling to view it.
Lesson: Ensure interactive elements are visible above the fold to maximize exposure.
Data Dilution:
Challenge: The exposure event fired at page load, including users who never interacted with the demo.
Lesson: Redefine exposure criteria to reflect actual interaction.
More Works More Works
More Works More Works
bildkritik
Go Back To Top
bildkritik
Go Back To Top